Since Karl Popper claimed Marxism was pseudoscience because of historicism, would he also claim historical linguistics (Grimm's Law, for example, is not based on experiments, only on historical facts…) is pseudoscience? -
![The distinction between falsification and refutation in the demarcation problem of Karl Popper - Telework The distinction between falsification and refutation in the demarcation problem of Karl Popper - Telework](https://www.telework.ro/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Falsifiability.jpg)
The distinction between falsification and refutation in the demarcation problem of Karl Popper - Telework
![Karl Popper, the enemy of certainty, part 3: rejecting politics as science | Liz Williams | The Guardian Karl Popper, the enemy of certainty, part 3: rejecting politics as science | Liz Williams | The Guardian](https://i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2012/9/24/1348475186700/Karl-Marx-008.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-align=bottom%2Cleft&overlay-width=100p&overlay-base64=L2ltZy9zdGF0aWMvb3ZlcmxheXMvdGctb3BpbmlvbnMtYWdlLTIwMTIucG5n&enable=upscale&s=cadd562804e322e1f142f308f00d78db)
Karl Popper, the enemy of certainty, part 3: rejecting politics as science | Liz Williams | The Guardian
![the problem of demarcation between science and pseudoscience and a popper's view of the problem of demarcation: falsificationism by Cansu Kaya the problem of demarcation between science and pseudoscience and a popper's view of the problem of demarcation: falsificationism by Cansu Kaya](https://0901.static.prezi.com/preview/v2/nqgsuuglobxig6qk7d44qgmpix6jc3sachvcdoaizecfr3dnitcq_3_0.png)